Quote:
Originally Posted by
nakadashi555
In other words, you got no proof lah.
No dependency on whether i accept your challenge and the existence of me coercing FLs.
But I know something about you….seems like TS not as power as he claims in ‘rawing’ FLs. Wanna share what you did to get raw?
The proof is in your post history.
No idea what “i did”. Please share here for all to read. Please.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
timeliness
Not going to get goaded into revealing my playground publicly here.
This is what being experienced and mature gets you.
You can continue and say that “oh she must be a fucking 40 yo ML”, but for those whom I gave out the contact to, it’s not.
Continue being hot headed, and offend many others. Hope you’ll learn how to be level headed and tactful the hard way when you start working full time.
Being a people pleaser is not easy, but it does not require constantly walking on eggshells.
Being a people pleaser, AND getting people to listen, and do what you want them to do, is a skill you have never acquired.
Lol. Bro. She is on the older side, who the fuck u trying to bluff? Not 40 then 30+.
You make it sound like bros here are desperate for your ML. Remind me whats so special about her again? That she wc you during work and drank your tcm medicine? Delusional…
Quote:
Originally Posted by
timeliness
Nah, you already lost it at 3. Yes you have the right to refuse said advice, but you don’t have the right to look down on others, calling them motherfuckers and all sorts of other names. Much less saying that thai FLs are low ses, finding them is having a loser mentality, and then proceeds to raw them in a manner which most bros will have second thoughts about.
People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
I live in a glass house and throw rocks. You say i have no right, yet I am still able to constantly post, and despite numerous zapping endeavours, still maintain positive “points”.
Keep crying and typing because you are offended by a post on an anonymous sex forum. Dont forget, your behaviour speaks volume about your character in real life too. Did you get bullied when you were younger or what? So sensitive?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nakadashi555
It is a false dichotomy that ‘sbf’ does not equate to ‘real life’. Some bros here shared openly with you, giving you real advice which would have solved your problems but not only did you reject them, you went into ad hominem attacks.
BTW you should be grateful this is an anonymous forum, you surely kena bash upside down already in real life. But I guess your response would be somewhere along the lines of “come lah, i have 6 pack abs and take tongkat ali so my test level alone can wipe out these low test mofos”.
Yes, it is not entirely mutually exclusive. But they are not the same. Not even anywhere close. Thats the point i was trying to make. Like comparing apples with oranges.
Are we now devolving into semantics?
“Real advice which would have solved my problems”. Very presumptous of you, to assume to know what would have solved my problems. Like that no need therapy or counsellors, just refer everybody to sammyboy.
Just curious, please point out which advice I rejected that would have solved my problems? How could you possibly be so omniscient?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
timeliness
Continue with your ad hominem, it’s interesting to see how low a clown can go after losing an argument.
There’s so many fallacies that I can’t even be bothered to list them all down now lol. The most dominant one now is ad hominem, but there’s others like appeal to hypocrisy (deflecting the problem by accusing others of the same), causal fallacy (incorrectly drawing a conclusion without enough evidence, like him accusing my contact being in her 40s or 30s, despite me never sharing openly)
This is really getting entertaining now.
You call it ad hominem, which implies it is part of my argument. It is not. It has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
It is a personal remark directed at you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
seanylit
Wow… I think u pple are crazy.. arguing with faceless pple over stuffs that cannot be verified on a anonymous sex forum..
Special exception. My last 1 hour here. Where else can these jokers find entertainment once im gone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Regretfulman
You call it ad hominem, which implies it is part of my argument. It is not. It has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
It is a personal remark directed at you.
Edit: And please, drop the pretense. 99% chance she is above 30 years old. If you post this in the tcss massage thread everybody would think the same.
If you deny this statement, you are saying she is 20+ years old? Congrats then, you got kc by a 20+yr old ml instead of 40 yr old. Lol?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
timeliness
You do realise that is exactly what ad hominem is right?
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ad-hominem
You are wrong.
From wikipedia " All of these follow a general scheme where instead of dealing with the essence of someone’s argument or trying to refute it, the interlocutor attacks the character(which i did) of the proponent of the argument and concludes that the attack refutes the argument(which i DID NOT)
Edit: the idea of ad hominem is that the attack refutes the argument. In my case, i did not use it to justify my argument. It was simply a personal insult directed at you, nothing to do with the argument.
Why do i even bother arguing with clowns who step intellectual? Lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by
staminadick
want to fuck then fuck
dun want to fuck then fuck off
too much theory and being guniang that why no girl like
Bro, trust me, i have absolutely ZERO intention of having some “pseudo-intellectual” argument with this timeliness guy.
Go see how i originally wrote. Full of crass and coarse language. But this fake intellectual wanna step ghey kiang, but i exposed him for his ignorance. “Ad hominem” HAHHAH MOFO doesnt even know what it means.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
timeliness
Are you serious in using wiki definition vs a definition from Cambridge dictionary?
Anyone knows that in summary, ad hominem is attacking person, instead of what the person said, which is exactly what you’re doing.
Surely you can use better sources to back up your claims, but I doubt you’ll find a better dictionary online.
Wah bro. You better delete this post. Now everybody knows you are a fake intellectual cunt trying to act smart.
The very essence of ad hominem attack is to attack a persons character and using it as a basis to refute the argument.
Not every personal insult is ad hominem. So if an ah beng gets in an argument with you, calls your mother a cheebye, that is now ad hominem?
The fact that you dont even know what ad hominem is and need to refer to dictionary just shows it all. And btw, if you are wondering why the dictionary shows"directed against a persons character", its because ad hominem is literally latin for “to the person”.
Theres literally 0 need to debate about this. You can consult any professor, reddit or whatever fucking bullshit, they will tell u that im right.
Dont throw big words when you dont understand the full essence of it.
Next time we just call each other cheebyes and motherfuckers and keep to the true spirit of the community. Type lesser also.