Confession of A Insecure Attention Seeking Golden Pussy


    Chapter #11

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by

    bubblejoy

    Of course! It’s “quoted”.

    Hehe no la never quote!

    I’m not worry about the haters. Haters gonna hate anyway

    You don’t wake up everyday to please anyone.

    Post #19
    17 comments
    Chapter #12

    IMO, I think one shouldn’t be in anywhere, not just SBF, looking or seeking for a committed relationship. But I can’t help it. When I see handsome guys I drool but I also know I can’t commit to them. And i dont come here to allow any man to get into my pants. Not now not ever. No one should be hunting for love bcos nobody falls in love by choice but by chance. And when you chance upon it, it doesn’t matter where you met the person.

    Some samsters that I know of were looking for fb/fling but eventually leads to committed relationship or even marriage. So it doesn’t matter at all, really.

    When you fall in love, you fall in love with the PERSON, not with the background/history/where about of that person. But if they can have such happy relationship, why can’t I? why do I have to go back home and rely on my jack rascal terror to satisfy me? Lover makeout with lots of passion is definitely so much better and happier than with my dog. I really don’t want to carry the burden of what happen when I was 6 anymore.

    Post #37
    26 comments
    Chapter #13

    I surely didn’t mean to slam redviolet down!

    I was all enthu about this nick of mine! Hahah

    Supporters of the other redviolet is also having fun too!!

    Post #64
    0 comments
    Chapter #14

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by

    kgbkgb

    Gosh, so much actions ar. Looks like I missed the show leh. keke

    HAHAHA!! That other redviolet ought to be shot!

    Picking fights with girls everyday. Today Meisha!!! ytd cheryl??? and so many other Omg!!!! since when redviolet become sbf pai kia alr!

    NICE! I likey!! Keep the bad publicity going okay~

    I’m not scary at all la pls. Don’t project me like I’m some insane creepy fella roaming around to stalk anyone

    Orh hor! So girls that always pick fights cannot have bad publicity?

    Post #65
    7 comments
    Chapter #15

    Name: Zerbel Ho

    Date of birth: 10 july 1991

    Height & Weight: 157cm/47kg

    Location: SG, Ang Mo Kio

    School attended: Ngee Ann Primary, Ngee Ann Secondary

    Qualification: N level

    Skills: Communication skill (2007)

    Language spoken: English, Chinese Language

    written: English

    Past work experience: Telemarketing (ERA) / F&B(Cocoa Tree in Airport) / Retail (Dollies, Pushcarts, KAPPA, M)PHOSIS, Ralph Lauren, Giorgio Armani & Diesel fragrances, Lancome.

    Post #73
    1 comments
    Chapter #16

    similiar scam.

    http://sg.news.yahoo.com/woman-cheat...orum-scam.html

    Woman cheats 230 buyers of S$52,000 in online forum scam

    A woman who goes by the name of “Pauline Ong” has cheated at least 230 buyers of almost $52,000 in a series of online forum scams.

    Confronted by irate buyers who turned up at her house earlier this month, she has since apologised and has started paying refunds to affected customers from at least nine different online sprees on the Singapore Motherhood forum.

    An online spree takes place when a group of like-minded online buyers come together to bundle their purchases to enjoy better rates and save on shipping. It’s frequently organised by people who have special connections or contacts in other countries who can bulk-purchase items for cheaper prices.

    Using two separate nicknames, noelpauline and Cynthia.k, Ong had created at least nine threads under the forum’s Overseas Spree section from March this year to advertise attractive shipping fees, lower tax and exchange rates for items including bags, wristlets and lanyards from upscale brands like Coach, Kate Spade and Longchamp.

    Ong’s initial sprees, run under her username noelpauline, were only partially fulfilled, however, and buyers complained of her unresponsiveness, subsequently demanding refunds.

    They accused Ong of cancelling and postponing appointments to hand over items, and of not updating forum threads promptly with purchases and deliveries.

    Cracks in her ruse appeared earlier this month, when a number of users on the forum first questioned the similarity between noelpauline and Cynthia.K.

    One affected buyer, who declined to be named, said she contacted noelpauline by email as she was not a member of the Singapore Motherhood forum. She told Yahoo! Singapore that out of the blue, she received a separate email about a similar sale from a person named Cynthia, even though she had never contacted the latter before.

    Another buyer who only wanted to be known as Mrs Tan said her experience of a buying spree organised by Ong left her disappointed.

    “This was the first time I didn’t get a bag even after placing my order almost two months ago,” she said. “Usually if the bag is out of stock, the organiser (of the spree) would inform (us) quite fast, and (give us) refunds within a few days or a week.”

    “I seriously feel she is not remorseful, judging from her numerous nicknames,” she added, explaining that users have to be members for more than a year before being able to post in the Overseas Sprees forum. “This seems like a well-planned scam.”

    Other users started to post similar suspicions in Cynthia.K’s and noelpauline’s spree threads. But Ong waved them off, claiming they were “computer glitches” and insisting she did not know the other user.

    She was finally barred from organising further sprees by forum moderators and earlier this month on 8 June, buyers who had been duped started demanding refunds. With a growing list of irate customers, some of whom threatened to file police reports, Ong relented and promised to return their money, appealing to them to avoid contacting the police.

    A screenshot of “Pauline Ong”’s first apology to the people she had cheated in her spree scams. [Click for larger …

    After some of the buyers confronted Ong at her Jurong West flat later that evening, Ong admitted she owned both accounts, and that she had indeed cheated her customers of their money.

    Ong’s father-in-law allegedly brokered a deal with the customers who met her in person, promising to pay everyone back if they held off filing police reports.

    By then, a list of over 200 affected buyers had come forward, demanding refunds for amounts ranging from just $33 to more than $2,000, and Ong started paying them back in batches.

    By Thursday evening, about 100 buyers have acknowledged receipt of the money they paid her. This amounted to slightly more than $22,000, about 40 per cent of the total.

    Refunds have been scheduled till the end of next month, and affected buyers say they are still adopting a wait-and-see approach to decide whether or not to press charges against Ong.

    Several attempts by Yahoo! Singapore to reach Ong for comment via her four listed mobile numbers and at least three email accounts were unsuccessful.

    Was Ong behind older scams as well?

    Since her scam was exposed, other buyers have also started coming forward with further accusations against Ong, saying her email addresses and usernames have turned up in other websites and forums offering similar deals as well.

    Online searches for Ong’s multiple email accounts turn up pages on Gmarket and Deluxemall.com, offering sprees for luxury bags and childcare items.

    One buyer, who goes by the nickname Mimosa, suspects Ong may have run similar sprees that ended in the same manner last year, under an account called lelebabyland.

    She told Yahoo! Singapore her sister bought into the scam then, and experienced no-shows when she was supposed to meet the spree organiser. Refunds were also only disbursed about a month later.

    Yet another user observed that the bank accounts used by another seller, who went by the nickname bagagreatdeal, was the same as the one used by Cynthia.k to collect money. After raising this to her directly, Ong said the former was her friend, who was using her bank account to collect money.

    This is not the first time a scam has happened on the Singapore Motherhood forum. In June last year, a woman was arrested for masterminding a scam on Resorts World Sentosa hotel stays bundled with Universal Studios Singapore tickets, cheating about 130 people of more than $95,000….

    Post #75
    0 comments
    Chapter #17

    better comments if u don’t know the person.

    All Comments

    Leave a comment…Comment Guidelines

    65 comments

    Violet • 4 hours ago

    Jail heavily! No excuse,!!! A person who has no morale don’t deserve to be pity!

    4 Replies

    7users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down1users disliked this comment

    The Unwanted4 hours ago

    Agree.same to those white monkeys.

    3users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    Antony3 hours ago

    Yes, Yes, agree with you The Unwanted…

    .

    3users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    Freedom Prevail!3 hours ago

    jail also cannot repay back the buyers, waste of tax-payers money to feed her in jail.

    8users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down1users disliked this comment

    Pusong_Bato • Guangzhou, China • 4 hours ago

    so sad that other people will try to cheat others just to earn a living…on the other hand, it’s good to see that no one is blaming FTs for this! LOL!!!

    3 Replies

    4users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    BanglaDashing3 hours ago

    FTs??? im FT 2. let me tell u 1 secret my pinoy gals cheat on their ah bangs in phil but many bf here cos they think nobody know here …hehe

    1users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    D3 hours ago

    As usual Crime doesn’t pays……this is a Merciless Society….. Why so stupid to conduct this. It’s pre-meditated! It’s a crime!!! It’s a MUST to be punished!!!

    .

    1users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    Mew2 hours 33 minutes ago

    She’s a local Singaporean mom. Some women will go to great lengths to satifsy their material needs.

    .

    Leave a comment…Comment Guidelines

    2users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down1users disliked this comment

    DAVIDO • Bandar Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia • 5 hours ago

    Many fools are still around. Good hunting for such scams. He3.

    2 Replies

    1users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    Alvin5 hours ago

    be a fool for once than be a life time.

    call me!!!

    .

    2users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    ang5 hours ago

    CALL THE POLICE

    .

    13users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down1users disliked this comment

    Deplore • 3 hours ago

    ISN’T THIS the look very similar to CPF scheme, as PAP HOLDING OUR HARD EARNED CPF MONEY? At 55, PAP said u wait till 60, then till 62, then till 65, then till 69……..

    At the same time, UNCONTROLLED INFLUX of FOREIGNERS TO WORK TO PAY CPF, to fund the need to have REFUND to those… More

    6 Replies

    6users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    Aids3 hours ago

    very similar, stall time AGAIN and AGAIN, get new fund to fund the withdrawal…..,

    NO YEARLY PUBLIC AUDIT on the status of health of ALL CPF monies held by PAP…

    1users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    Tan2 hours 40 minutes ago

    Agree with Ang. This person should be put in jail. Otherwise alot will learn from her.

    .

    1users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    K2 hours 29 minutes ago

    How can there be no public audit? Don’t they come out with annual report so that those in the know can examine for the rest of us who do not know how to read the accounting statements? This is a deplorable state of affairs, if true. Should be raised in Parliament & public can hear what is… More

    .

    7users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    Patrick • Singapore, Singapore • 5 hours ago

    i know you can get quite a bit of savings, but how can some of these people just transfer amounts like $2000 to another person without any form of recourse?

    3 Replies

    1users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    Mew2 hours 27 minutes ago

    Think they were ‘duped’ into thinking she was reliable due to the fact that some ‘buyers’ were her various identities/kakis. Same for the Resorts World scam last year.

    .

    0users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    sherlin1 hour 57 minutes ago

    I would like prefer to meetup, see the good n deal for 2k amount no matter how reliable the seller is.

    .

    0users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    Neon1 hour 48 minutes ago

    @Sherlin meetup very ma fan sometimes they ask you must go according to both party suitable times location and conditions, anyway its up to your personal choice of how you want to acquire you goods

    .

    4users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    Tang Chee Thiam • 5 hours ago

    I bought a ‘security camera’ from Gmarket. Have been waiting for 3 weeks.

    With this news, i will be making a trip to the Police Station TODAY.

    4 Replies .

    8users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    jennyc • Singapore, Singapore • 5 hours ago

    Whether the victims press charges or not, the police must step in. Noting from her multi cheating scams, she should not be let off simply her father in law proposed she pay back. Just how many out there still in the dark? Without publicly exposing her, she may cheat again and may be on a bigger… More

    Reply .

    0users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down2users disliked this comment

    Tay • 3 hours ago

    If no charges is being filed against her, means she is free to go?

    So if i break into someone’s house and the owner doesn’t press any charges. I’m free to go?

    Hello police??? hello?!??

    Reply .

    6users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    Tony • Singapore, Singapore • 5 hours ago

    Police Action…A must here!…This is a cheating offence. If we let crime get away with an apology…even if the sum seems small….more will be encouraged to scam…Likewise in Politics, a law or by law broken is nonetheless a law broken and should be brought to court as we know of a case last… More

    1 Reply .

    12users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down2users disliked this comment

    Tel • Singapore, Singapore • 6 hours ago

    A fool and his money are easily parted.

    10 Replies .

    9users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down1users disliked this comment

    55JUSTICE • 11 hours ago

    Immaterial whether the buyers make a police report or not.

    Since its already known and its a crime, she should be arrested.

    Its ponzi scheme.

    1 Reply .

    4users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    Eat U • 11 hours ago

    Lousy scam.

    Reply .

    3users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    Just Me • Singapore, Singapore • 4 hours ago

    she should be charged with fraud regardless of paying it all back or not. If she gets away with it this time, next time she may plan better and the run away with the money. She is obviously a professional criminal, planning everything well. She made a mistake and thats how she got found out. She… More

    Reply .

    3users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    Aces • Singapore, Singapore • 4 hours ago

    This pauling ong is a goondoo or what? Pull a stunt like this still have her address known to the buyers.

    Reply .

    3users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    D • Singapore, Singapore • 3 hours ago

    Singapore is a Merciless Society yet u still commit such crimes! It’s pre-meditated! It’s all planned! It’s a crime! And Crime Doesn’t pay!!! U foolish oaf!

    Reply .

    2users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    angrySGcitizen • 4 hours ago

    Just send her to jail. ACRA should also blacklist her from running any future businesses. Commercial crime is no child’s play.

    1 Reply .

    2users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    K • Singapore, Singapore • 2 hours 11 minutes ago

    230 is not a small number. It is cheating 230 times by one who is bold but has a numbed conscience

    Reply .

    1users liked this commentPlease sign in to rate a Thumb UpPlease sign in to rate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    Fp Tan • Singapore, Singapore • 3 hours ago

    Really interesting. Buying cheaper may not be the wisest option. Think about it. Unless the item is 50% cheaper otherwise why take the risk, and more stress? Even if it is 50% cheaper, doew it really matter is actual dollar and cents (sense)? Think of the trouble you will land yourself if it do not… More

    Reply .

    Post #76
    0 comments